--- url: 'https://nc.giglio-bradylist.com/north-carolina/alamance-county-sheriffs-department' title: "Alamance County Sheriff's Department" author: name: Anonymous date: '2021-09-19T18:01:54+00:00' updated: '2026-05-18T18:57:35+00:00' type: law_enforcement_organization tags: - 'North Carolina' image: 'https://nc.giglio-bradylist.com/sites/default/files/2026-05/unnamed%20%281%29.png' published: true --- ## [Alamance County Sheriff's Department](/north-carolina/alamance-county-sheriffs-department) 109 South Maple Street Graham, NC 27253 [(336) 570-6300](tel:%28336%29570-6300) [https://sheriff.ala…](https://sheriff.alamancecountync.gov/) ## Notice of Consent Decree The Alamance County Sheriff's Department is subject to a Consent Decree by the U.S. Department of Justice which directly impacts the organization's systemic credibility. [Learn more >>>](/consent-decrees) The Alamance County Sheriff’s Office presents an institutional *Brady/Giglio* concern arising from its federal civil-rights record, including DOJ findings, federal pleadings, and settlement-based reform obligations addressing discriminatory enforcement, unlawful or unreasonable seizures, racially selective traffic stops, checkpoint practices, arrest disparities, jail-booking and immigration-referral practices, deficient supervision, inadequate training, deficient data collection, substandard reporting, weak monitoring, and failed accountability controls. This concern is institutional rather than personal: it is not a claim that every ACSO officer is dishonest or individually engaged in misconduct. The concern is that the agency’s documented civil-rights record places its witness system under heightened disclosure risk because the integrity of ACSO stops, searches, seizures, arrests, reports, charging support, affidavits, investigative narratives, supervisory approvals, and courtroom testimony depends on whether the affected officer, unit, supervisor, command chain, record system, and case file have been affirmatively cleared through transparent, verifiable review. The DOJ record and related materials constitute potential impeachment and exculpatory evidence wherever ACSO supplies officers, reports, affidavits, investigations, arrests, searches, charging support, or testimony. Discriminatory enforcement bears directly on bias, selective enforcement, motive, credibility, and equal-protection concerns. Unlawful or unreasonable stops, checkpoint practices, seizures, and arrests bear directly on suppression, probable cause, investigative reliability, and report accuracy. Deficient supervision, reporting, monitoring, training, data collection, and accountability bear directly on agency integrity, supervisory reliability, witness credibility, and the dependability of ACSO-generated case records. Prosecutors relying on ACSO personnel are on notice of heightened *Brady/Giglio* obligations and must identify, obtain, review, preserve, classify, and disclose decree-related or reform-record impeachment material in time for meaningful defense use. Courts should require disclosure safeguards before relying on ACSO testimony, reports, affidavits, or investigative work. POST authorities, bar regulators, and judicial oversight bodies should recognize that continued reliance on undisclosed civil-rights and reform-record impeachment material creates certification, ethical, disciplinary, and due-process consequences. The *Brady List* determination is that the Alamance County Sheriff’s Office is not deemed disclosure-ready unless it can demonstrate preservation, classification, transmission, and disclosure of all *Brady/Giglio*-relevant material arising from its DOJ findings record, federal litigation record, settlement obligations, and related institutional failures. Until that showing is made, ACSO remains subject to heightened *Brady/Giglio* concern, and its witnesses, reports, investigations, arrests, searches, affidavits, and testimony require affirmative credibility review before courtroom reliance. Prosecutors have ethical obligations and may be held individually accountable under the Rules of Professional Conduct \[R.P.C.\] for their conduct within the legal system. Violations of these Rules can result in disciplinary actions which may include sanctions, suspension, or disbarment. - [R.P.C. 3.4: *Fairness to Opposing Party & Counsel*](https://giglio-bradylist.com/model-rule-professional-conduct-rule-34-fairness-opposing-party-counsel "American Bar Association, Rules of Professional Conduct - Rule 3.4: Fairness to Opposing Party & Counsel") - [R.P.C. 3.8: *Special Responsibilities of the Prosecutor*](https://giglio-bradylist.com/model-rule-professional-conduct-rule-38-special-responsibilities-prosecutor "American Bar Association, Rules of Professional Conduct - Rule 3.8: Special Responsibilities of the Prosecutor") - [R.P.C. 8.3: *Reporting Professional Misconduct*](https://giglio-bradylist.com/model-rule-professional-conduct-rule-83-reporting-professional-misconduct) This information has been curated by journalists and [private citizens](/private-citizens "Private Citizens"); and, this platform is available as-a-service to all [Peace Officer Standards & Training \[POST\] Departments](/peace-officer-standards-training-post-departments "Peace Officer Standards & Training [POST] Departments"), [Prosecutors](/prosecutors "Prosecutors"), and [Law Enforcement Organizations \[LEOrgs\]](/organizations-law-enforcement-et-al "Organizations").